![]()
The slowing economy and insane gas prices in the US have made it increasingly harder for automakers to sell their large SUVs and trucks.
GM announced today plans to cut a shift at hour of its North American plants. This cut is going to lead to approximately 3,500 layoffs (4% of GM's North American workforce). Approximately 88,000 fewer trucks and 50,000 fewer SUVs are going to be produced this calendar year.
“With rising fuel prices, a softening economy and a downward trend on current and future market demand for full-size trucks, a significant adjustment was needed to align our production with market realities,” GM North America President Troy Clarke said in a statement.
Layoffs are expected to start in July.
Full Story: msnbc
Related Stories:
Chicago 2008 Preview: 2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid Pickup Unveiled
2008 Chevy Tahoe and GMC Yukon Hybrid SUVs Achieve 21/22mpg

Comments (24)
It's not just GM's sales that are hurting. My brother sells for Toyota. They have 65 Sequias are 40 Trucks in stock. All in overflow lots.
Posted by Cheap Car Lover | April 28, 2008 8:02 PM
Posted on April 28, 2008 20:02
Big surprise!
In the world of $4.00/gallon gas (probably $5/gal by summer), not that many want a 3-ton vehicle that gets 10-12mpg in the city and maybe 17-18mpg on the highway.
Posted by Noya | April 28, 2008 8:27 PM
Posted on April 28, 2008 20:27
Then why isn't Lexus cutting back production on the LX and the LS by similar percentages?
Posted by uh huh | April 28, 2008 9:06 PM
Posted on April 28, 2008 21:06
Because people who can afford those cars haven't been hit hard by the increased gas prices--yet. You just wait. Eventually, the luxury brands will see similar production declines. Expect $5.50/gallon for premium by year's end.
Posted by Jim | April 28, 2008 9:13 PM
Posted on April 28, 2008 21:13
so, 140k trucks less.
What happened to the utility, all the stories why americans have lifestyles that NEED trucks?
I suppose it is not that they keep on driving the old truck.
Are the lifestyles indeed changing? There is hope...
Posted by waldorf and statler | April 29, 2008 1:37 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 01:37
See? Capitalism at work. Thats why you hippies should shut up and let the logics do their work.
Posted by Rothschild Bank | April 29, 2008 4:57 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 04:57
$4/gal came to my world a few weeks ago...diesel running $4.19 (at least 5 minutes ago). I'm surprised things aren't worse than they already are. 80% of the 'stuff' I consume as a consumer comes off a semi truck...and they don't get any breaks at the pump, either.
Posted by WVO | April 29, 2008 7:15 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 07:15
Gee. It'd be nice if GM had some smaller, fuel-economic quality cars in their lineup. But who could have foreseen fuel prices rising like this? I mean, that's impossible!
As evidence, see that no car companies in the world are producing small cars! They are ALL producing huge, gas guzzling SUVS, right? They are all now cutting their workforces, because they have no production lines producing quality smaller car designs to shift employees too.
(End sarcasm)
The winds of higher fuel prices have been blowing since the '70s. They've been at hurricane force since the 90's. GM CHOSE to ignore them, lured by cheap profits, and now the GM companies, and their employees especially, are going to pay the price.
Posted by kw | April 29, 2008 7:31 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 07:31
Curious how everyone wants to blame GM, Ford, etc. for there being so many 5000-6000lb vehicles on the road. Somebody had to buy those vehicles, GM and Ford just adjusted to the market. I can't blame them for taking profits for providing what the shortsighted consumers wanted to buy. Now they will have to adjust to the market again, just like they did in the late 70's with car and truck downsizing.
What's very troubling is that we are repeating history once again. We all knew that there would be another energy crisis, but for some reason we all drove our Suburbans and Expeditions right into the thick of it.
Posted by WS | April 29, 2008 8:03 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 08:03
Individuals will buy what they need at that moment. In general, US citizens have had their heads in the sand regarding pressures on fuel prices.
However, GM, as a corporation, should have seen those pressures, and should have seen the future need for smaller, more fuel efficient cars, and gotten one or more prepped for the production pipeline for a day such as this.
Since they haven't, they are already behind the curve on this trend. By the time they get on the ball, their competitors will have had 5-10 YEARS to lock in the marketplace.
That is how GM has thrown away its market share.
Posted by kw | April 29, 2008 8:16 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 08:16
I guess that's while GM has Dual Mode Hybrids and their small block diesel right around the conner. And look at that, they adjusted the Cobalt so it now leads in fuel economy in its class. 6 speeds are becoming standard across the line slowly. GM also trademarked a symbol and signed a contract with UAW to produce 8 speeds. The Gen V small blocks get displacement on demand and direct injection for better fuel economy. The 2.0L Turbo Ecotec is going to end up being an option in many of their larger cars now. Then there is the Chevy Volt. Nope, GM hasn't been pre-pairing for this at all.
Did they over estimate the market this year? Yes, but so did Ford, Dodge, and Toyota.
Oh, and before I get ripped about the turbo comment, I am sorry GM can make a 2.0L Turbo which gets 28 mpg on the highway, thanks to it's flat torque curve. The only other one is BMW with the 335i, but they use sequential twin turbos to get their torque curve flat.
Posted by Avatar | April 29, 2008 9:03 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 09:03
Wasn't Lexus the first one out witht he 8 speed?
Posted by John | April 29, 2008 9:37 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 09:37
@ John
Yes, in the ls460.
Posted by Cheap Car Lover | April 29, 2008 9:46 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 09:46
So, to whomever complaining about Americans not needing SUVs: since when is everything that you buy a 'need'? If Americans can afford it and want something a bit better than they absolutely need, great! I am glad that we live in such a prosperous country that we all have more than we need if we try even a little bit.
Second, energy crisis, energy crisis, blah, blah, blah. What is a crisis to you any way? There was no energy crisis in the '70s, there was political manipulation of the global oil supply. There is no crisis now. Can you buy gasoline for your car? I can. Where's the crisis? So it costs a bit more, factor it into your budget. Where's the crisis? Eat out about half as often and you'll more than make up the difference. A crisis is when there is no more energy and there is plenty. Don't be such a drama-queen with the doom-and-gloom ENERGY CRISIS rhetoric.
So, GM is cutting back because slacking sales of SUVs and big trucks due to a weakening economy and rising prices. A few days ago we hear that Ford is increasing production capacity for the Focus. The marketplace changes and corporations adjust. Why the doom and gloom?
Posted by Jake | April 29, 2008 10:04 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 10:04
I sure hope prices on those trucks come down. I could use a new used truck. The new silverados look sweet! Finally GM got the interior design correct! Better yet, if I find a good price on a tundra, that'll be my first pick!
High gas prices does have some positive impacts. And yes, I only drive my truck for its intended purpose, its not a daily driver. Thats where the corolla comes in!
Posted by Nodos | April 29, 2008 10:52 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 10:52
This should be no surprise to anyone. With the other article discussing Toyota's large inventories of large SUV/Trucks, the market is correcting itself. People are adjusting to higher prices by purchasing more efficient vehicles or holding off large purchases. Contractors, people who need to tow, etc will still purchase large trucks. The casual large truck buyer will hold off. All car companies try to predict trend approx. 4-5 years before a model introduction, with this case Toyota, GM, Dodge, Nissan have all been stung with misjudging the market.
Posted by longdxcommuter | April 29, 2008 1:13 PM
Posted on April 29, 2008 13:13
Lexus has an 8 speed in their 4300 lb ls460. It gets 16 and 24.
Chevrolet has a 4 speed in their 4400 lb 1500 truck. It gets 15 and 20.
Given the aerodynamic and weight difference that's probably a dead heat.
Oh, and it costs 3 times as much. But it does have 3 more seats and a big L on the forehead, I mean hood.
Posted by uh huh | April 29, 2008 6:30 PM
Posted on April 29, 2008 18:30
Just get rid of the big SUV lineup altogether. Hardly anyone is buying big SUV's anymore.
Posted by SteelCity1981 | April 29, 2008 10:00 PM
Posted on April 29, 2008 22:00
@ uh huh
I hope you're kidding. Who compares an LS Lexus against a Truck?
Posted by Cheap Car Lover | April 30, 2008 7:52 AM
Posted on April 30, 2008 07:52
@CCL
Someone who says people buy excess, heavy trucks or ridiculously over-contented cars, what's the difference?
I don't need to tow 19500 lbs and I don't need rear-seat heaters or adjustable rear-seat thigh supports. heck, most of the time I don't need rear seats.
I'm just saying that perception is why we are all yelling about trucks and not about bloated-ugly-dripping-with-useless-features luxury cars.
Oh, and I know a few people whose two cars are HD trucks and Qmobiles (One Lexus, one Cadillac) so the buyer isn't always different, either.
Posted by uh huh | April 30, 2008 5:50 PM
Posted on April 30, 2008 17:50
Serve them right for neglecting their small truck, that piece of crap Colorado. Same thing with Ford and its Ranger (I own one.) Why didn't they invest money in those smaller truck? How about developing a nice small diesel for those midsize trucks. Those damn full size trucks just kept getting bigger and bigger.
Posted by Topper | May 1, 2008 11:25 AM
Posted on May 1, 2008 11:25
From April's archive:
"Production of GM's Lambda SUVs (Outlook, Acadia and Enclave) came to a halt when UAW hourly workers went on strike at GM's Lansing, Michigan plant.
Approximately 65 workers went on strike last night due to unsuccessful negotiations. “We’d been at the negotiating table with Alliance since May 29, 2007 and still did not have a fair and equitable offer,” UAW said.
The Lansing, Michigan plant makes the interior carpets for the Saturn Outlook, GMC Acadia and Buick Enclave, three of GM's hottest selling vehicles right now."
______________________________________________________
I wonder how that strike is going now?
Posted by booyah | May 1, 2008 2:02 PM
Posted on May 1, 2008 14:02
Good, the less of those gas hogs on the road the better. My sympathy to the people who will lose their jobs.
It's a step towards making the roads safer for people who drive sensible vehicles.
Those gas hogs are ruining the enviroment, along with the value of the dollar.
Posted by Bill O | May 1, 2008 5:18 PM
Posted on May 1, 2008 17:18
to Bill O.
Could you explain to the class how this truck ruins the value of the dollar. I'm interested to read.
Posted by ok | May 1, 2008 10:26 PM
Posted on May 1, 2008 22:26