![]()
Volkswagen officially unveiled the all-new 2009 Scirocco this week in Geneva, but currently there are no plans to bring it to the US.
In a recent interview that Bloomberg had with Detlef Wittig, Volkswagen’s sales and marketing chief, he stated:
“The exchange rate is the only reason for not selling it in the U.S. This car would fit the U.S. market but at the current exchange rate we wouldn’t make any money.”
If this is the only reason, VW could maybe figure out a way to bring it here, but dont count on seeing the new coupe on these shores any time soon.
Full Story: Bloomberg
Related Stories:
VW Scirocco Officially Unveiled...Even Though We've Seen the Photos for Days
More Photos of the 2009 VW Scirocco Leaked
2009 Volkswagen Scirocco Exposed...Too bad the US Isn't Getting It!
It's Official: The US is Not Going to Get the Upcoming VW Scirocco!
2009 Volkswagen Scirocco Spy Photos...The New VW Has Been Caught in the U.S.!

Comments (31)
Thankyou , G.W.
Posted by TrainReKS | March 5, 2008 9:39 PM
Posted on March 5, 2008 21:39
Which means that VW knows it wants too much for that fugly P.O.S...
Posted by Mazda6 Guy | March 5, 2008 9:43 PM
Posted on March 5, 2008 21:43
And our president has done it again...
Posted by SEALBoy | March 5, 2008 9:45 PM
Posted on March 5, 2008 21:45
Dont blame the President. Blame the 4 before him. If it wasnt for NAFTA and no set standard for our dollar's value, then the value of the dollar wouldt be an issue.
If you look to economies where the value of the currency is based on a standard like gold or other material objects then the value has stayed on par to the value of everything else.
Posted by John | March 5, 2008 9:46 PM
Posted on March 5, 2008 21:46
You can't blame Bush for everything... you people are idiots. EVERYTHING isn't his fault. I think he's an idiot too, but you can't blame him for not getting a car, that's freaking ridiculous.
The dollar is declining because of the federal reserve printing money like there's no tomorrow. A couple hundred billion of that new money every year is because of the GOV, but by and large it's because they're cutting interest rates when inflation is rising. And GOV spending isn't Bush's fault anyways. CONGRESS increases spending, NOT the president. The executive branch(GW) enforces laws, the legislative branch makes them...
Greenspan set the economy up for staglation when he kept the federal funds rate at 1.5% for 18 months.
The economy boomed in the 90's thanks to NAFTA(which now people hate for some reason, IDIOTS) and a host of other wonderful things. Greenspan tried to seal a bursting bubble in 2001-2003 with that ridiculously low rate.
But please people, blame the man who is actually at fault, ALAN GREENSPAN, former Chairman of the Federal Reserve (which is actually a private banking organization, not GOV like the name would imply) If you're looking for someone else to blame, it's the REPUBLICANS, for raising spending 65% during Bush's presidency.
Posted by wayne gretzky | March 5, 2008 9:59 PM
Posted on March 5, 2008 21:59
@ John
Hooray for the gold standard!
Posted by wayne gretzky | March 5, 2008 10:01 PM
Posted on March 5, 2008 22:01
Wa wa wa, cry me a river.
Like we need another sub-standard german car on our shores.
Posted by zippy | March 6, 2008 7:30 AM
Posted on March 6, 2008 07:30
Wayne,
the FED is printing money to compensate for crap W created with his administration. And Congress spent money on his pet wars so his friends get commissions etc..
It is his fault only not directly but certiny his fult. Record sufficit spent and record debt created.
The guy dug holes generations will be filling up and still could not keep the economy healthy. Thats incompetence in its purest form.
But its a good thing maybe in the sense that voters will learn to appreciate that the president needs to be competent not simply someone who babbels honor, patriotism, country, god, we are the best, they hate us for being great,...
Maybe he is the last idiot in a while to be elected. Then again, maybe not :/
Posted by Diesel | March 6, 2008 7:48 AM
Posted on March 6, 2008 07:48
yay, you're all so typical.
why hasn't anyone realized that placing blame does NOTHING to solve the problem? if you took half of your blaming energy and put it into fixing the problem we'd be so much better off.
*sigh*
looks like my generation has our work cut out for us.
Posted by Dan | March 6, 2008 8:07 AM
Posted on March 6, 2008 08:07
Don't blame Bush, he only got a gentleman's C in economics at Yale.
Posted by Jim | March 6, 2008 9:12 AM
Posted on March 6, 2008 09:12
Yes, let's blame the President for our economic situation, since he has so much impact on it. I'm guessing he was behind the sub-prime mortgage fiasco? I bet you think Clinton was solely responsible for the expansion in the 90's, too.
Posted by Polynikes | March 6, 2008 10:18 AM
Posted on March 6, 2008 10:18
@John:
You can blame the current government for our declining dollar. With the US taking huge loans from China to pay for the Iraq war and our Neo Con Republican leaders printing more money like there's no tomorrow the dollar is set to slip even further down. It's actually something many people believe is a part of forming the NAU and switching over to the Amero once the dollar declines in value enough. It's pretty easy to see coming, basically the same thing that happened to Europe. Just google the CFR and North American Union. Hell the dollar has fallen so much that many drug smugglers quit bringing drugs in from Canada since it's not worth it with the US $ sucking so bad.
I'm sure there's a big recession on the way and the stupid stimulous plan won't do a damn thing for the long term. The US needs to kick the Neo Cons out of office, and with Bush making a mockery of his endorsement for McCain I'm pretty sure the GOP just handed the presidency to the Dems!
Posted by Gary | March 6, 2008 10:23 AM
Posted on March 6, 2008 10:23
@Dan:
You may not believe it, but posting small tid bits of information on Blogs is actually doing something since most of our media doesn't tell us the whole story on any topic and only the story their bosses want to hear. Things like voting for Ron Paul and informing unaware people about his policies and beliefs are great places to start.
With our current choices for President we can either waste $1 Trillion in Iraq over the next 10 years (McCain) or we can waste $1 Trillion in the world poverty organization (Dems). Either way were sending money we need very much to take care of our own people out over seas. It's time for real change and not just slogans like Barak, Clinton, and McCain talk about.
Posted by Gary | March 6, 2008 10:30 AM
Posted on March 6, 2008 10:30
@ Gary:
I'm just tired of the blame game, that's all. I'm having a hard time seeing how it's anything but constructive.
Posted by Dan | March 6, 2008 11:46 AM
Posted on March 6, 2008 11:46
If Bush had not sent our to Iraq to stay for so long, then we would not be tking so much loans from China. Because of this, we are printing out more money to compensate for that...Or at least I think so. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I will check the blogs later tonight. Peace out!!!
Posted by Saheed | March 6, 2008 12:04 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 12:04
@Dan:
Agreed, but in this case pointing the blame at GW is fairly deserved. He got us into Iraq without a declaration of war which he doesn't have the power to do. Without the Iraq war gas wouldn't be as expensive and the dollar would be worth more, and those are pretty hard topics to dispute.
Posted by Gary | March 6, 2008 12:06 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 12:06
@Gary
The weenies in congress gave away their authority to declare war, wussed out, and layed in on the president so that they wouldn't have to feel accountable. They didn't do their jobs and gave authority to the president that he should never have had. And congress approved every one of those budgets. He doesn't have the power to do it, but he is doing the bidding of the cowards in congress who don't have the backbone to take a stand. Those cowards are on both sides of the aisle.
We need a congress with a backbone rather than the weenies who shirk their responsibilities and then stand around blaming others for it. But lookie who is running for President, those weener Senators.
Posted by Jake | March 6, 2008 12:34 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 12:34
Let me get this straight. Volvo can bring a car that's basically the same as this - the C30 - with a 5-cylinder turbo for $23K MSRP, but VW can't do it for under $40K? And that's the fault of Bush and Congress? How about it being the fault of VW's ass-backward management?
Posted by BigWill | March 6, 2008 1:18 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 13:18
You do realize that gold prices are more volatile than the $US is. The reason your country is going to shits is because of your gigantic debt / deficit and ridiculous spending. Blame your government, most of whom are major stockholders in the oil and defense industries, the only industries benefiting from your current policies.
Posted by gm0n3y | March 6, 2008 2:07 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 14:07
Gold prices are volatile?
Provide me some source that proves your point.
Posted by Cheap Car Lover | March 6, 2008 4:04 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 16:04
Britain's national debt is far worse than that of the United States. Pretty much all countries have a huge national debt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_debt
Look at that before you Europeans run your mouths. All your countries are in huge debts too. It's because all democracies develop into socialist welfare states. The Australians are in better shape than the US, but it looks to me like the rest of you are hypocrites.
Posted by Cheap Car Lover | March 6, 2008 4:16 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 16:16
"Polynikes:
Yes, let's blame the President for our economic situation, since he has so much impact on it. I'm guessing he was behind the sub-prime mortgage fiasco? I bet you think Clinton was solely responsible for the expansion in the 90's, too."
Clinton had nothing to do with the 90s, no politician did that was all entrepreneurship. But Bush definitely has had a negative effect on the economy, namely the sub-prime fiasco.
Questions about ARM's were raised years before the bubble burst, but no one investigated, and its the President's job to enforce laws, including ones against misleading the public or sub-standard business practices.
Also, his deficit spending is pumping oodles of money onto the market, lowering the value of the dollar. He proposes budgets, congress approves them, and his budgets have been deficit ridden for his entire presidency.
Posted by Allen | March 6, 2008 5:18 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 17:18
Sorry, I thought this was an auto blog. If I hit refresh will it take me to the correct spot?
Posted by Al | March 6, 2008 6:49 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 18:49
VW needs to work on improving their products rather the making excuses. Their cars start falling apart before you get them home. My 2002 VM in the first year had the following problems
1. broken passenger side window, recalled a year later for plastic clips, never got all the glass out the door.
2. coils replaced 2 twice, induced stalling, never resolved, workaround use 87 octane
3. Interior trim pealing, replaced never resolved
4. ECU failure, replaced
In the second year the coils failed yet again and invoked the lemon law and washed my hand of POS. Five of my co-worker also had frequent problems with there VW's
While I don't share Gary's extremist views he is 100% right about why the dollar is in free fall and that is Bush's fault. Congress is also shares the blame. We American people also share the blame for re-electing them. This is also why oil is sky rocketing, it's traded in US dollars. So when the dollar falls oil prices go up.
@Dan:
Accountability and blame is extremely important. You have to understand what was done wrong and there must be consequence or there is no motivation to change the behavior.
Posted by RX-7 Guy | March 6, 2008 7:23 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 19:23
Since we are playing the blame game, I blame VW for not fixing its quality control issues. Had a transmission failure on my first AND second Passat. Test drove the damn thing on the interstate and what not.It didn't help that it was summer and the AC sucked.
Posted by John | March 6, 2008 8:55 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 20:55
@John
You know the saying... Fool me once, shame on you. Foole me twice, shame on me. I've always avoided VW like the plague. Unless I find myself needing chassis for a dune or swamp buggy that is.
Posted by Gary | March 6, 2008 9:34 PM
Posted on March 6, 2008 21:34
I drive an Audi with quite a few miles on it and it really hasnt had any problems. Is Audi independent of VW when it comes to design or do I just happen to be lucky? I do have a leaky hose or two, but that's an easy fix.
Posted by John P | March 7, 2008 12:07 AM
Posted on March 7, 2008 00:07
Average yearly gold prices:
1971 40.8
1972 58.16
1973 97.32
1974 159.26
1975 161.02
1976 124.84
1977 147.71
1978 193.22
1979 306.68
1980 612.56
1981 460.03
1982 375.67
1983 424.35
1984 360.48
1985 317.26
1986 367.66
1987 446.46
1988 436.94
1989 381.44
1990 383.51
1991 362.11
1992 343.82
1993 359.77
1994 384
1995 384.17
1996 387.77
1997 331.02
1998 294.24
1999 278.98
2000 279.11
2001 271.04
2002 309.73
2003 363.38
2004 409.72
2005 444.74
2006 603.46
2007 695.39
Some years the prices are pretty stable but others the price can go up or down by huge amounts (more than 300% increase from 78-80).
As far as debt is concerned, many (if not most) other western countries are paying their's off (i.e. no deficit), the US just keeps adding to it and in record numbers.
From: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-budget5feb05,0,4188925.story
"White House budget director Jim Nussle acknowledged that the federal deficit will double from $162 billion in fiscal 2007, which ended last September, to more than $400 billion in both fiscal 2008 and 2009."
Posted by gm0n3y | March 7, 2008 3:02 PM
Posted on March 7, 2008 15:02
The US officially left the gold standard in 1977, that's why the price went up so much. People went out and bought up gold and silver like crazy. No one had faith in our currency anymore. It took a few years to level out again.
Right now we have an economic downturn and gold is skyrocketing because inflation is up. and any economist knows you can hedge against inflation (especially over the long term) by buying gold.
Posted by Cheap Car Lover | March 12, 2008 5:05 PM
Posted on March 12, 2008 17:05
er 1971. Anyways. It took a long time to cool the ridiculous inflation that ensued.
Posted by Cheap Car Lover | March 12, 2008 5:08 PM
Posted on March 12, 2008 17:08
I hope they can work something out, that car is tight...I can see myself buying one..and probably saving some money on gas too.
Posted by larry | March 18, 2008 6:59 PM
Posted on March 18, 2008 18:59