Pricing and the options list for BMW's all-new "sports activity coupe" the X6 has leaked onto the internet.
The 300 horsepower X6 xDrive35i starts at $52,500 before options like Bluetooth and navigation are added. The 400hp twin-turbo 4.4L V8 BMW X6 xDrive 50i starts at $63,000. The xDrive35i could easily reach into the $60K price range once you start checking the option boxes, while the xDrive50i could reach well into the $70K range. The sport package alone costs over $3,000.
BMW X6 xDrive 50i - $63,000
Premium (ZPP) - $1,750
Sport w/19″ tire package (ZSP) - $3,100
Cold Weather Package (ZCW) - $900
Rear Climate Package (ZRC) - $900
Premium Sound Package (ZPS) - $2,000
Active Ventilated Seat Package (ZAV) - $1,100
BMW X6 xDrive 35i - $52,500
Premium (ZPP) - $1,750
Sport w/19″ tire package (ZSP) - $3,600
Cold Weather Package (ZCW) - $900
Rear Climate Package (ZRC) - $900
Premium Sound Package (ZPS) - $2,000
Active Ventilated Seat Package (ZAV) - $2,100
Technology Package (ZTP) - $2,000
Options
Alcantara/Leather Combination - No cost
Nappa Leather - $1,000
Metallic Paint - No cost
Running Boards - $300
HD Radio - $350
Heated Rear Seats - $350
Rear-View Camera - $400
Heated Front Seats - $500
Automatic Tailgate - $500
Satellite Radio - $595
Soft Close Doors - $600
BMW Assist w/Bluetooth - $750
Sport package wheel upgrade (20″) - $950
Comfort Access - $1,000
Multi-contour Seats - $1,200
Heads-Up Display - $1,200
Active Steering - $1,400
Rear Seat Entertainment - $1,700
Navigation with RTTI - $1,900
Full Story: Autoblog
Related Stories:
Detroit Auto Show Preview: Production Version of the BMW X6 Unveiled
BMW Vision EfficientDynamics Concept Unveiled...Basically a Diesel-Hybrid X5
2008 BMW 1-Series Convertible Officially Unveiled...Hits Dealers in Spring 2008
Comments (11)
I'm quite the fan of BMW. In fact, I'm saving up to put a hefty down payment so I can drive a 335 here in the next couple weeks.
But isn't a coupe a two-door vehicle? I'm pretty sure I count four door handles. I'd expect something like this from lower end companies, but BMW? Come on, Bavarians...
Freaky looking thing... I don't know if I like it or not. I guess that means I won't be getting one.
Posted by Joan of Arc | February 27, 2008 8:41 PM
Posted on February 27, 2008 20:41
Kinda overpriced snob appeal IMO. BMW nickel and dimes you for all your features. How is that luxury? Standard would be luxury, epspecially for 63K.
Soft Close doors? WTF? Are you we to inept to close a door gently or are our ears to sensitive to the sound of a "thud". A good german car's doors close nicely too. You shouldn't need such a dumb thing.
Oh well, guess its another "baby protector" to take your spoiled child to the bus stop, because they are to weak to walk the extra block to the house.
Posted by iridiumshadow | February 27, 2008 10:27 PM
Posted on February 27, 2008 22:27
Looks good fron the side, but that's it. Unimpressive at the back, and the front end is terrible. It looks like a marriage between the worse of the Cayenne front end with the worst of the 3 series, with some Hyundai/Subaru Tribeca on the mix here and there.
The worst feature: excessive lines on the hood, the trunk lid does not fit the bumper, the isolated fog lights look too small in the big black hole they are in. And its ride high is too high, bigger wheel opening could help there.
Is this suppose to go after the 2009 Infiniti FX 50/55, I'll pass easily. I much prefer my current FX over this one by miles, it oozes style, IMHO.
Posted by Sphere | February 28, 2008 1:56 AM
Posted on February 28, 2008 01:56
I like it. And I know these cars are a blast to drive on back roads. I like it.
Posted by Sphere | February 28, 2008 1:59 AM
Posted on February 28, 2008 01:59
Yuck!
Eek!
Why?
These would be my recommendations for a more sincere and accurate name for this contraption. Avoid it.
Posted by Schillacci | February 28, 2008 6:54 AM
Posted on February 28, 2008 06:54
Excellent. Only $52K? I'll take two please.
Posted by D | February 28, 2008 11:04 AM
Posted on February 28, 2008 11:04
I don't think it's as ugly as some think, but it's still a 'crossover' and I hate crossovers and high riding cars. Who wan't s stupid coupe/suv thing anyways?
I think BMW can charge whatever they want for a car anymore.
@ Sphere - You haven't driven one of these, they're not available yet. In general BMW's are awesome drivers, and I'm sure this one will be no different. But please don't post nonsense comments.
Posted by Cheap Car Lover | February 28, 2008 12:18 PM
Posted on February 28, 2008 12:18
Why is it nonsense when you yourself has said that you're sure it will be no different than other BMWs that are awesome drivers?
Also, the tastes of american drivers are changing- parents are a huge market that automakers court aggressively and they're flocking to crossovers for easy ingress/egress for loading their children into carseats (they're higher so parents don't have to bend down as much) and also for their generally larger cargo and interior space. Like having a minivan without the stigma or an SUV with better gas mileage.
Posted by bliq | February 28, 2008 12:49 PM
Posted on February 28, 2008 12:49
Its not as hideous as anything GM is building these days, at least... still, with Mercedes building SUVs that look good, this thing has an uphill battle to win.
Posted by Allen | February 28, 2008 12:59 PM
Posted on February 28, 2008 12:59
Actually, GM builds alot nicer looking products then what I see here. This vehicle looks like a rebadged Infiniti, which is not saying much at all. If u are going to pay over 50k for this thing, might as well have the aesthetics to go with it. This design DOES NOT cut it!!!
Posted by Jim B | February 29, 2008 2:03 AM
Posted on February 29, 2008 02:03
What is the function of this thing? To do everything poorly?
Oh, I think I just got it. It is an M3 made for winter driving. Well that is useful in Alaska for 5 months of the year.
Anyway, I don't get it and will not buy it even if it is a BMW. Besides, we only have a few Starbucks in town so really no place to show it off anyway.
Posted by Gib | February 29, 2008 3:52 AM
Posted on February 29, 2008 03:52